- Status
- 302 Found
- Server
- Apache/2.4.52 (Ubuntu)
Raw response
HTTP/1.1 302 Found Date: Tue, 09 Jun 2026 01:33:07 GMT Server: Apache/2.4.52 (Ubuntu) Location: kapunyito.php Content-Length: 0 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8
Host
217.154.167.29
Tags: Hosting Expired certificate
As of our latest check on 2026-06-09, 217.154.167.29 (IONOS SE, AS8560, Germany) had 2 open ports (80, 443) and 18 known CVEs.
Known CVEs on this host
2open ports
0names pointing here
18known CVEs
0known exploited
Open ports and CVEs as of our latest check of this host, 2026-06-09.
CVEs by severity: CRITICAL 3 HIGH 11 MEDIUM 3 LOW 1
A match is an indication, not proof: it is based on the software version a service reported, and fixes are often backported without changing the version. See the list
Not counted: 61 on a distribution build — the fix may be backported (http_server 2.4.52). See them
Not counted: 3 only affect another platform (http_server 2.4.52). See them
- Network
- IONOS SE AS8560
- Open ports
- 80, 443 · at our latest check, 2026-06-09
- Location
- Germany DE
- Hostname
- ip217-154-167-29.pbiaas.com · reverse DNS, checked 2026-10-05
- Route
- 217.154.160.0/20 · announced by IONOS SE AS8560 RPKI valid
- Organisation
- IONOS SE · Network service provider (transit)
- Registry network
- de-ber-ionos-cloud-txl · 217.154.160.0 - 217.154.175.255 · IONOS SE · RIPE
- Abuse contact
- [email protected] · for de-ber-ionos-cloud-txl
- First seen
- 2026-06-09 01:32 UTC
- Last seen alive
- 2026-06-09 01:34 UTC
- Hosted domains
- No host name points here
Reputation
Not a Tor relay, not a VPN or privacy relay address, and not on a current public blocklist.
Services (2)
443/tcp
TLS
first 2026-06-09 · last 2026-06-09
- TLS
- TLSv1.2
- Certificate for
- vps.csuszdafoto.hu, www.vps.csuszdafoto.hu
- Issued by
- R13
- Valid
- 2026-05-09 → 2026-08-07
Raw response
HTTP/1.1 400 Bad Request Date: Tue, 09 Jun 2026 01:33:07 GMT Server: Apache/2.4.52 (Ubuntu) Content-Length: 446 Connection: close Content-Type: text/html; charset=iso-8859-1 <!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//IETF//DTD HTML 2.0//EN"> <html><head> <title>400 Bad Request</title> </head><body> <h1>Bad Request</h1> <p>Your browser sent a request that this server could not understand.<br /> Reason: You're speaking plain HTTP to an SSL-enabled server port.<br /> Instead use the HTTPS scheme to access this URL, please.<br /> </p> <hr> <address>Apache/2.4.52 (Ubuntu) Server at vps.csuszdafoto.hu Port 80</address> </body></html>
Vulnerabilities
Distribution build — the fix may be backported (61)
These CVEs were matched on software built by an operating-system distribution whose package revision the service does not show. Distributions often fix a flaw without changing the upstream version number, so whether this build is affected cannot be told from its version. They are not counted. 1 of them is known to be exploited.
CVEs by severity: CRITICAL 15 HIGH 32 MEDIUM 14
| CVE | Software |
|---|---|
| CVE-2024-38475 CRITICAL 9.1 known exploited | http_server 2.4.52 · port 80 |
| CVE-2022-22720 CRITICAL 9.8 | http_server 2.4.52 · port 80 |
| CVE-2022-23943 CRITICAL 9.8 | http_server 2.4.52 · port 80 |
| CVE-2022-31813 CRITICAL 9.8 | http_server 2.4.52 · port 80 |
| CVE-2023-25690 CRITICAL 9.8 | http_server 2.4.52 · port 80 |
| CVE-2024-38474 CRITICAL 9.8 | http_server 2.4.52 · port 80 |
| CVE-2024-38476 CRITICAL 9.8 | http_server 2.4.52 · port 80 |
| CVE-2026-28780 CRITICAL 9.8 | http_server 2.4.52 · port 80 |
| CVE-2026-29167 CRITICAL 9.8 | http_server 2.4.52 · port 80 |
| CVE-2026-44631 CRITICAL 9.8 | http_server 2.4.52 · port 80 |
| CVE-2022-22721 CRITICAL 9.1 | http_server 2.4.52 · port 80 |
| CVE-2022-28615 CRITICAL 9.1 | http_server 2.4.52 · port 80 |
| CVE-2025-23048 CRITICAL 9.1 | http_server 2.4.52 · port 80 |
| CVE-2026-42535 CRITICAL 9.1 | http_server 2.4.52 · port 80 |
| CVE-2022-36760 CRITICAL 9.0 | http_server 2.4.52 · port 80 |
| CVE-2026-24072 HIGH 8.8 | http_server 2.4.52 · port 80 |
| CVE-2025-58098 HIGH 8.3 | http_server 2.4.52 · port 80 |
| CVE-2024-38473 HIGH 8.1 | http_server 2.4.52 · port 80 |
| CVE-2006-20001 HIGH 7.5 | http_server 2.4.52 · port 80 |
| CVE-2022-22719 HIGH 7.5 | http_server 2.4.52 · port 80 |
| CVE-2022-26377 HIGH 7.5 | http_server 2.4.52 · port 80 |
| CVE-2022-29404 HIGH 7.5 | http_server 2.4.52 · port 80 |
| CVE-2022-30556 HIGH 7.5 | http_server 2.4.52 · port 80 |
| CVE-2023-27522 HIGH 7.5 | http_server 2.4.52 · port 80 |
| CVE-2023-31122 HIGH 7.5 | http_server 2.4.52 · port 80 |
| CVE-2024-27316 HIGH 7.5 | http_server 2.4.52 · port 80 |
| CVE-2024-38472 HIGH 7.5 | http_server 2.4.52 · port 80 |
| CVE-2024-38477 HIGH 7.5 | http_server 2.4.52 · port 80 |
| CVE-2024-39573 HIGH 7.5 | http_server 2.4.52 · port 80 |
| CVE-2024-42516 HIGH 7.5 | http_server 2.4.52 · port 80 |
| CVE-2024-43204 HIGH 7.5 | http_server 2.4.52 · port 80 |
| CVE-2024-47252 HIGH 7.5 | http_server 2.4.52 · port 80 |
| CVE-2025-49630 HIGH 7.5 | http_server 2.4.52 · port 80 |
| CVE-2025-53020 HIGH 7.5 | http_server 2.4.52 · port 80 |
| CVE-2025-55753 HIGH 7.5 | http_server 2.4.52 · port 80 |
| CVE-2025-59775 HIGH 7.5 | http_server 2.4.52 · port 80 |
| CVE-2026-29169 HIGH 7.5 | http_server 2.4.52 · port 80 |
| CVE-2026-34059 HIGH 7.5 | http_server 2.4.52 · port 80 |
| CVE-2026-34355 HIGH 7.5 | http_server 2.4.52 · port 80 |
| CVE-2026-34356 HIGH 7.5 | http_server 2.4.52 · port 80 |
| CVE-2026-42536 HIGH 7.5 | http_server 2.4.52 · port 80 |
| CVE-2026-49975 HIGH 7.5 | http_server 2.4.52 · port 80 |
| CVE-2025-49812 HIGH 7.4 | http_server 2.4.52 · port 80 |
| CVE-2023-38709 HIGH 7.3 | http_server 2.4.52 · port 80 |
| CVE-2026-29168 HIGH 7.3 | http_server 2.4.52 · port 80 |
| CVE-2026-44185 HIGH 7.3 | http_server 2.4.52 · port 80 |
| CVE-2026-44186 HIGH 7.3 | http_server 2.4.52 · port 80 |
| CVE-2025-65082 MEDIUM 6.5 | http_server 2.4.52 · port 80 |
| CVE-2026-33523 MEDIUM 6.5 | http_server 2.4.52 · port 80 |
| CVE-2026-43951 MEDIUM 6.5 | http_server 2.4.52 · port 80 |
| CVE-2024-24795 MEDIUM 6.3 | http_server 2.4.52 · port 80 |
| CVE-2026-29170 MEDIUM 6.1 | http_server 2.4.52 · port 80 |
| CVE-2023-45802 MEDIUM 5.9 | http_server 2.4.52 · port 80 |
| CVE-2026-44119 MEDIUM 5.5 | http_server 2.4.52 · port 80 |
| CVE-2025-66200 MEDIUM 5.4 | http_server 2.4.52 · port 80 |
| CVE-2022-28614 MEDIUM 5.3 | http_server 2.4.52 · port 80 |
| CVE-2022-37436 MEDIUM 5.3 | http_server 2.4.52 · port 80 |
| CVE-2026-33007 MEDIUM 5.3 | http_server 2.4.52 · port 80 |
| CVE-2026-33857 MEDIUM 5.3 | http_server 2.4.52 · port 80 |
| CVE-2026-34032 MEDIUM 5.3 | http_server 2.4.52 · port 80 |
| CVE-2026-33006 MEDIUM 4.8 | http_server 2.4.52 · port 80 |
Only affects another platform (3)
These CVEs need a platform this host visibly does not run (for example a flaw of the Windows build on a Linux host). They are not counted.
CVEs by severity: HIGH 2 MEDIUM 1
| CVE | Software |
|---|---|
| CVE-2024-40898 HIGH 7.5 | http_server 2.4.52 · port 80 |
| CVE-2024-43394 HIGH 7.5 | http_server 2.4.52 · port 80 |
| CVE-2022-28330 MEDIUM 5.3 | http_server 2.4.52 · port 80 |
Port history
Every port that has answered a connection on this address, and when. A port is listed as open above only when a service was identified on it. Times are UTC.