22/tcp
SSH
SFTPGo_2.2.2
first 2026-06-08 · last 2026-06-08
- Server
- SSH-2.0-SFTPGo_2.2.2
- Host key
- ssh-ed25519 955a4f42e71c170c…
Raw response
SSH-2.0-SFTPGo_2.2.2
Host
213.211.166.145
Tags: Expired certificate
As of our latest check on 2026-06-08, 213.211.166.145 (EDPNET Belgium BV, AS9031, Belgium) had 3 open ports (22, 80, 443) and no known CVEs.
Known CVEs on this host
3open ports
0names pointing here
0known CVEs
0known exploited
Open ports and CVEs as of our latest check of this host, 2026-06-08.
No known CVEs now
Not counted: 137 on a distribution build — the fix may be backported (http_server 2.4.51, python 3.8.12, openssl 1.1.1h). See them
Not counted: 6 only affect another platform (http_server 2.4.51, python 3.8.12). See them
- Network
- EDPNET Belgium BV AS9031
- Open ports
- 22, 80, 443 · at our latest check, 2026-06-08
- Location
- Belgium BE
- Hostname
- 213.211.166.145.static.edpnet.net · reverse DNS, checked 2026-10-05
- Route
- 213.211.128.0/18 · announced by EDPNET Belgium BV AS9031 RPKI valid
- Organisation
- EDPNET Belgium BV · Network service provider (transit)
- Registry network
- EDPNET · 213.211.160.0 - 213.211.175.255 · EDPNET Belgium BV · RIPE
- Abuse contact
- [email protected] · for EDPNET
- First seen
- 2026-06-08 02:02 UTC
- Last seen alive
- 2026-06-08 02:03 UTC
- Hosted domains
- No host name points here
Reputation
Not a Tor relay, not a VPN or privacy relay address, and not on a current public blocklist.
Services (3)
80/tcp
HTTP
Apache/2.4.51 (FreeBSD) OpenSSL/1.1.1h-freebsd mod_python/3.5.0-9d223c3 Python/3.8.12
first 2026-06-08 · last 2026-06-08
- Status
- 301 Moved Permanently
- Title
- 301 Moved Permanently
- Server
- Apache/2.4.51 (FreeBSD) OpenSSL/1.1.1h-freebsd mod_python/3.5.0-9d223c3 Python/3.8.12
Raw response
HTTP/1.1 301 Moved Permanently Date: Mon, 08 Jun 2026 02:02:38 GMT Server: Apache/2.4.51 (FreeBSD) OpenSSL/1.1.1h-freebsd mod_python/3.5.0-9d223c3 Python/3.8.12 Location: https://www.appelsien.be Content-Length: 232 Content-Type: text/html; charset=iso-8859-1 <!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//IETF//DTD HTML 2.0//EN"> <html><head> <title>301 Moved Permanently</title> </head><body> <h1>Moved Permanently</h1> <p>The document has moved <a href="https://www.appelsien.be">here</a>.</p> </body></html>
443/tcp
TLS
first 2026-06-08 · last 2026-06-08
- TLS
- TLSv1.2
- Certificate for
- appelsien.be
- Issued by
- R12
- Valid
- 2026-04-28 → 2026-07-27
Raw response
HTTP/1.1 400 Bad Request Date: Mon, 08 Jun 2026 02:02:38 GMT Server: Apache/2.4.51 (FreeBSD) OpenSSL/1.1.1h-freebsd mod_python/3.5.0-9d223c3 Python/3.8.12 Content-Length: 362 Connection: close Content-Type: text/html; charset=iso-8859-1 <!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//IETF//DTD HTML 2.0//EN"> <html><head> <title>400 Bad Request</title> </head><body> <h1>Bad Request</h1> <p>Your browser sent a request that this server could not understand.<br /> Reason: You're speaking plain HTTP to an SSL-enabled server port.<br /> Instead use the HTTPS scheme to access this URL, please.<br /> </p> </body></html>
Distribution build — the fix may be backported (137)
These CVEs were matched on software built by an operating-system distribution whose package revision the service does not show. Distributions often fix a flaw without changing the upstream version number, so whether this build is affected cannot be told from its version. They are not counted. 1 of them is known to be exploited.
CVEs by severity: CRITICAL 25 HIGH 70 MEDIUM 39 LOW 3
| CVE | Software |
|---|---|
| CVE-2024-38475 CRITICAL 9.1 known exploited | http_server 2.4.51 · port 80 |
| CVE-2022-1292 CRITICAL 10.0 | openssl 1.1.1h · port 80 |
| CVE-2022-2068 CRITICAL 10.0 | openssl 1.1.1h · port 80 |
| CVE-2007-4559 CRITICAL 9.8 | python 3.8.12 · port 80 |
| CVE-2019-12900 CRITICAL 9.8 | python 3.8.12 · port 80 |
| CVE-2021-3711 CRITICAL 9.8 | openssl 1.1.1h · port 80 |
| CVE-2021-44790 CRITICAL 9.8 | http_server 2.4.51 · port 80 |
| CVE-2022-22720 CRITICAL 9.8 | http_server 2.4.51 · port 80 |
| CVE-2022-23943 CRITICAL 9.8 | http_server 2.4.51 · port 80 |
| CVE-2022-31813 CRITICAL 9.8 | http_server 2.4.51 · port 80 |
| CVE-2022-37454 CRITICAL 9.8 | python 3.8.12 · port 80 |
| CVE-2023-25690 CRITICAL 9.8 | http_server 2.4.51 · port 80 |
| CVE-2024-38474 CRITICAL 9.8 | http_server 2.4.51 · port 80 |
| CVE-2024-38476 CRITICAL 9.8 | http_server 2.4.51 · port 80 |
| CVE-2026-28780 CRITICAL 9.8 | http_server 2.4.51 · port 80 |
| CVE-2026-29167 CRITICAL 9.8 | http_server 2.4.51 · port 80 |
| CVE-2026-44631 CRITICAL 9.8 | http_server 2.4.51 · port 80 |
| CVE-2026-56154 CRITICAL 9.8 | http_server 2.4.51 · port 80 |
| CVE-2026-57941 CRITICAL 9.8 | http_server 2.4.51 · port 80 |
| CVE-2026-59797 CRITICAL 9.8 | http_server 2.4.51 · port 80 |
| CVE-2022-22721 CRITICAL 9.1 | http_server 2.4.51 · port 80 |
| CVE-2022-28615 CRITICAL 9.1 | http_server 2.4.51 · port 80 |
| CVE-2025-23048 CRITICAL 9.1 | http_server 2.4.51 · port 80 |
| CVE-2026-42535 CRITICAL 9.1 | http_server 2.4.51 · port 80 |
| CVE-2022-36760 CRITICAL 9.0 | http_server 2.4.51 · port 80 |
| CVE-2026-24072 HIGH 8.8 | http_server 2.4.51 · port 80 |
| CVE-2026-93546 HIGH 8.8 | http_server 2.4.51 · port 80 |
| CVE-2025-58098 HIGH 8.3 | http_server 2.4.51 · port 80 |
| CVE-2021-44224 HIGH 8.2 | http_server 2.4.51 · port 80 |
| CVE-2024-38473 HIGH 8.1 | http_server 2.4.51 · port 80 |
| CVE-2026-73636 HIGH 8.1 | http_server 2.4.51 · port 80 |
| CVE-2015-20107 HIGH 8.0 | python 3.8.12 · port 80 |
| CVE-2022-42919 HIGH 7.8 | python 3.8.12 · port 80 |
| CVE-2023-4807 HIGH 7.8 | openssl 1.1.1h · port 80 |
| CVE-2006-20001 HIGH 7.5 | http_server 2.4.51 · port 80 |
| CVE-2020-10735 HIGH 7.5 | python 3.8.12 · port 80 |
| CVE-2021-23840 HIGH 7.5 | openssl 1.1.1h · port 80 |
| CVE-2022-0778 HIGH 7.5 | openssl 1.1.1h · port 80 |
| CVE-2022-22719 HIGH 7.5 | http_server 2.4.51 · port 80 |
| CVE-2022-26377 HIGH 7.5 | http_server 2.4.51 · port 80 |
| CVE-2022-29404 HIGH 7.5 | http_server 2.4.51 · port 80 |
| CVE-2022-30556 HIGH 7.5 | http_server 2.4.51 · port 80 |
| CVE-2022-4450 HIGH 7.5 | openssl 1.1.1h · port 80 |
| CVE-2022-45061 HIGH 7.5 | python 3.8.12 · port 80 |
| CVE-2023-0215 HIGH 7.5 | openssl 1.1.1h · port 80 |
| CVE-2023-0464 HIGH 7.5 | openssl 1.1.1h · port 80 |
| CVE-2023-24329 HIGH 7.5 | python 3.8.12 · port 80 |
| CVE-2023-27522 HIGH 7.5 | http_server 2.4.51 · port 80 |
| CVE-2023-31122 HIGH 7.5 | http_server 2.4.51 · port 80 |
| CVE-2023-36632 HIGH 7.5 | python 3.8.12 · port 80 |
| CVE-2024-27316 HIGH 7.5 | http_server 2.4.51 · port 80 |
| CVE-2024-38472 HIGH 7.5 | http_server 2.4.51 · port 80 |
| CVE-2024-38477 HIGH 7.5 | http_server 2.4.51 · port 80 |
| CVE-2024-39573 HIGH 7.5 | http_server 2.4.51 · port 80 |
| CVE-2024-42516 HIGH 7.5 | http_server 2.4.51 · port 80 |
| CVE-2024-43204 HIGH 7.5 | http_server 2.4.51 · port 80 |
| CVE-2024-47252 HIGH 7.5 | http_server 2.4.51 · port 80 |
| CVE-2024-4741 HIGH 7.5 | openssl 1.1.1h · port 80 |
| CVE-2024-6232 HIGH 7.5 | python 3.8.12 · port 80 |
| CVE-2024-7592 HIGH 7.5 | python 3.8.12 · port 80 |
| CVE-2025-13836 HIGH 7.5 | python 3.8.12 · port 80 |
| CVE-2025-49630 HIGH 7.5 | http_server 2.4.51 · port 80 |
| CVE-2025-53020 HIGH 7.5 | http_server 2.4.51 · port 80 |
| CVE-2025-55753 HIGH 7.5 | http_server 2.4.51 · port 80 |
| CVE-2025-59775 HIGH 7.5 | http_server 2.4.51 · port 80 |
| CVE-2026-15308 HIGH 7.5 | python 3.8.12 · port 80 |
| CVE-2026-29169 HIGH 7.5 | http_server 2.4.51 · port 80 |
| CVE-2026-34059 HIGH 7.5 | http_server 2.4.51 · port 80 |
| CVE-2026-34355 HIGH 7.5 | http_server 2.4.51 · port 80 |
| CVE-2026-34356 HIGH 7.5 | http_server 2.4.51 · port 80 |
| CVE-2026-3644 HIGH 7.5 | python 3.8.12 · port 80 |
| CVE-2026-4224 HIGH 7.5 | python 3.8.12 · port 80 |
| CVE-2026-42536 HIGH 7.5 | http_server 2.4.51 · port 80 |
| CVE-2026-46729 HIGH 7.5 | http_server 2.4.51 · port 80 |
| CVE-2026-48005 HIGH 7.5 | http_server 2.4.51 · port 80 |
| CVE-2026-49975 HIGH 7.5 | http_server 2.4.51 · port 80 |
| CVE-2026-56153 HIGH 7.5 | http_server 2.4.51 · port 80 |
| CVE-2026-56449 HIGH 7.5 | http_server 2.4.51 · port 80 |
| CVE-2026-59685 HIGH 7.5 | http_server 2.4.51 · port 80 |
| CVE-2026-63045 HIGH 7.5 | http_server 2.4.51 · port 80 |
| CVE-2026-63292 HIGH 7.5 | http_server 2.4.51 · port 80 |
| CVE-2026-63686 HIGH 7.5 | http_server 2.4.51 · port 80 |
| CVE-2026-63718 HIGH 7.5 | http_server 2.4.51 · port 80 |
| CVE-2026-7210 HIGH 7.5 | python 3.8.12 · port 80 |
| CVE-2021-28861 HIGH 7.4 | python 3.8.12 · port 80 |
| CVE-2021-3450 HIGH 7.4 | openssl 1.1.1h · port 80 |
| CVE-2021-3712 HIGH 7.4 | openssl 1.1.1h · port 80 |
| CVE-2023-0286 HIGH 7.4 | openssl 1.1.1h · port 80 |
| CVE-2025-49812 HIGH 7.4 | http_server 2.4.51 · port 80 |
| CVE-2023-38709 HIGH 7.3 | http_server 2.4.51 · port 80 |
| CVE-2026-29168 HIGH 7.3 | http_server 2.4.51 · port 80 |
| CVE-2026-44185 HIGH 7.3 | http_server 2.4.51 · port 80 |
| CVE-2026-44186 HIGH 7.3 | http_server 2.4.51 · port 80 |
| CVE-2026-73637 HIGH 7.3 | http_server 2.4.51 · port 80 |
| CVE-2026-4519 HIGH 7.0 | python 3.8.12 · port 80 |
| CVE-2016-3189 MEDIUM 6.5 | python 3.8.12 · port 80 |
| CVE-2023-2650 MEDIUM 6.5 | openssl 1.1.1h · port 80 |
| CVE-2025-65082 MEDIUM 6.5 | http_server 2.4.51 · port 80 |
| CVE-2026-33523 MEDIUM 6.5 | http_server 2.4.51 · port 80 |
| CVE-2026-43951 MEDIUM 6.5 | http_server 2.4.51 · port 80 |
| CVE-2024-24795 MEDIUM 6.3 | http_server 2.4.51 · port 80 |
| CVE-2025-12084 MEDIUM 6.3 | python 3.8.12 · port 80 |
| CVE-2025-12781 MEDIUM 6.3 | python 3.8.12 · port 80 |
| CVE-2026-29170 MEDIUM 6.1 | http_server 2.4.51 · port 80 |
| CVE-2020-1971 MEDIUM 5.9 | openssl 1.1.1h · port 80 |
| CVE-2021-23841 MEDIUM 5.9 | openssl 1.1.1h · port 80 |
| CVE-2021-3449 MEDIUM 5.9 | openssl 1.1.1h · port 80 |
| CVE-2021-4160 MEDIUM 5.9 | openssl 1.1.1h · port 80 |
| CVE-2022-4304 MEDIUM 5.9 | openssl 1.1.1h · port 80 |
| CVE-2023-45802 MEDIUM 5.9 | http_server 2.4.51 · port 80 |
| CVE-2024-2511 MEDIUM 5.9 | openssl 1.1.1h · port 80 |
| CVE-2024-0727 MEDIUM 5.5 | openssl 1.1.1h · port 80 |
| CVE-2025-13837 MEDIUM 5.5 | python 3.8.12 · port 80 |
| CVE-2025-6075 MEDIUM 5.5 | python 3.8.12 · port 80 |
| CVE-2026-0864 MEDIUM 5.5 | python 3.8.12 · port 80 |
| CVE-2026-44119 MEDIUM 5.5 | http_server 2.4.51 · port 80 |
| CVE-2025-66200 MEDIUM 5.4 | http_server 2.4.51 · port 80 |
| CVE-2022-2097 MEDIUM 5.3 | openssl 1.1.1h · port 80 |
| CVE-2022-28614 MEDIUM 5.3 | http_server 2.4.51 · port 80 |
| CVE-2022-37436 MEDIUM 5.3 | http_server 2.4.51 · port 80 |
| CVE-2023-0465 MEDIUM 5.3 | openssl 1.1.1h · port 80 |
| CVE-2023-0466 MEDIUM 5.3 | openssl 1.1.1h · port 80 |
| CVE-2023-27043 MEDIUM 5.3 | python 3.8.12 · port 80 |
| CVE-2023-3817 MEDIUM 5.3 | openssl 1.1.1h · port 80 |
| CVE-2023-40217 MEDIUM 5.3 | python 3.8.12 · port 80 |
| CVE-2023-5678 MEDIUM 5.3 | openssl 1.1.1h · port 80 |
| CVE-2024-9287 MEDIUM 5.3 | python 3.8.12 · port 80 |
| CVE-2026-33007 MEDIUM 5.3 | http_server 2.4.51 · port 80 |
| CVE-2026-33857 MEDIUM 5.3 | http_server 2.4.51 · port 80 |
| CVE-2026-34032 MEDIUM 5.3 | http_server 2.4.51 · port 80 |
| CVE-2026-58415 MEDIUM 5.3 | http_server 2.4.51 · port 80 |
| CVE-2026-79768 MEDIUM 5.3 | http_server 2.4.51 · port 80 |
| CVE-2026-33006 MEDIUM 4.8 | http_server 2.4.51 · port 80 |
| CVE-2026-42528 MEDIUM 4.3 | http_server 2.4.51 · port 80 |
| CVE-2026-42356 LOW 3.7 | http_server 2.4.51 · port 80 |
| CVE-2025-13462 LOW 3.3 | python 3.8.12 · port 80 |
| CVE-2026-6019 LOW 2.1 | python 3.8.12 · port 80 |
Only affects another platform (6)
These CVEs need a platform this host visibly does not run (for example a flaw of the Windows build on a Linux host). They are not counted.
CVEs by severity: HIGH 5 MEDIUM 1
| CVE | Software |
|---|---|
| CVE-2018-25032 HIGH 7.5 | python 3.8.12 · port 80 |
| CVE-2024-40898 HIGH 7.5 | http_server 2.4.51 · port 80 |
| CVE-2024-43394 HIGH 7.5 | http_server 2.4.51 · port 80 |
| CVE-2026-3087 HIGH 7.5 | python 3.8.12 · port 80 |
| CVE-2022-26488 HIGH 7.0 | python 3.8.12 · port 80 |
| CVE-2022-28330 MEDIUM 5.3 | http_server 2.4.51 · port 80 |
Port history
Every port that has answered a connection on this address, and when. A port is listed as open above only when a service was identified on it. Times are UTC.