- Server
- SSH-2.0-OpenSSH_8.9p1 Ubuntu-3
- Host key
- ssh-rsa 0639d6e6d6a6f327…
Raw response
SSH-2.0-OpenSSH_8.9p1 Ubuntu-3
Host
As of our latest check on 2026-08-25, 103.160.63.230 (PT Herza Digital Indonesia, AS140443, Indonesia) had 2 open ports (22, 80) and 55 known CVEs.
Open ports and CVEs as of our latest check of this host, 2026-08-25.
CVEs by severity: CRITICAL 5 HIGH 20 MEDIUM 18 LOW 12
A match is an indication, not proof: it is based on the software version a service reported, and fixes are often backported without changing the version. See the list
Not counted: 61 on a distribution build — the fix may be backported (http_server 2.4.52). See them
Not counted: 3 only affect another platform (http_server 2.4.52). See them
Not a Tor relay, not a VPN or privacy relay address, and not on a current public blocklist.
SSH-2.0-OpenSSH_8.9p1 Ubuntu-3
HTTP/1.1 200 OK
Date: Tue, 25 Aug 2026 09:39:29 GMT
Server: Apache/2.4.52 (Ubuntu)
Vary: Accept-Encoding
Content-Encoding: gzip
Content-Length: 886
Content-Type: text/html;charset=UTF-8
�ko�0���WxH��`�5%L]�i�zӚ���i2��#0M�_�åM�冚U���cs0���=�l��]t�?.�����)���xz�E�����Ÿ��7L�@�xH���{���(����3��?�$��OB��#1@��E����r���=Kf���@��=3cے>���E�H�->�$v;
���4�Ն|� Ȏ���{������m�"?f�����9?���������|�3�9R�S�H4p�-t�*�����{�O�%n�#�E8qŀ8��� �(�ց����
o�l�b�,I�7=%��bJ�l�Itg�7G�#����2���o��З�m�F]%.D�m�C��Q��=��]�$�aѬ�1���i���4��bg��c��zC5��m�,��襱��m(��: ���
!��X�`�:\-Dm���h�/�7��2�1͒0�w0�rD� �i�...<truncated>
These CVEs were matched on software built by an operating-system distribution whose package revision the service does not show. Distributions often fix a flaw without changing the upstream version number, so whether this build is affected cannot be told from its version. They are not counted. 1 of them is known to be exploited.
CVEs by severity: CRITICAL 15 HIGH 32 MEDIUM 14
| CVE | Software |
|---|---|
| CVE-2024-38475 CRITICAL 9.1 known exploited | http_server 2.4.52 · port 80 |
| CVE-2022-22720 CRITICAL 9.8 | http_server 2.4.52 · port 80 |
| CVE-2022-23943 CRITICAL 9.8 | http_server 2.4.52 · port 80 |
| CVE-2022-31813 CRITICAL 9.8 | http_server 2.4.52 · port 80 |
| CVE-2023-25690 CRITICAL 9.8 | http_server 2.4.52 · port 80 |
| CVE-2024-38474 CRITICAL 9.8 | http_server 2.4.52 · port 80 |
| CVE-2024-38476 CRITICAL 9.8 | http_server 2.4.52 · port 80 |
| CVE-2026-28780 CRITICAL 9.8 | http_server 2.4.52 · port 80 |
| CVE-2026-29167 CRITICAL 9.8 | http_server 2.4.52 · port 80 |
| CVE-2026-44631 CRITICAL 9.8 | http_server 2.4.52 · port 80 |
| CVE-2022-22721 CRITICAL 9.1 | http_server 2.4.52 · port 80 |
| CVE-2022-28615 CRITICAL 9.1 | http_server 2.4.52 · port 80 |
| CVE-2025-23048 CRITICAL 9.1 | http_server 2.4.52 · port 80 |
| CVE-2026-42535 CRITICAL 9.1 | http_server 2.4.52 · port 80 |
| CVE-2022-36760 CRITICAL 9.0 | http_server 2.4.52 · port 80 |
| CVE-2026-24072 HIGH 8.8 | http_server 2.4.52 · port 80 |
| CVE-2025-58098 HIGH 8.3 | http_server 2.4.52 · port 80 |
| CVE-2024-38473 HIGH 8.1 | http_server 2.4.52 · port 80 |
| CVE-2006-20001 HIGH 7.5 | http_server 2.4.52 · port 80 |
| CVE-2022-22719 HIGH 7.5 | http_server 2.4.52 · port 80 |
| CVE-2022-26377 HIGH 7.5 | http_server 2.4.52 · port 80 |
| CVE-2022-29404 HIGH 7.5 | http_server 2.4.52 · port 80 |
| CVE-2022-30556 HIGH 7.5 | http_server 2.4.52 · port 80 |
| CVE-2023-27522 HIGH 7.5 | http_server 2.4.52 · port 80 |
| CVE-2023-31122 HIGH 7.5 | http_server 2.4.52 · port 80 |
| CVE-2024-27316 HIGH 7.5 | http_server 2.4.52 · port 80 |
| CVE-2024-38472 HIGH 7.5 | http_server 2.4.52 · port 80 |
| CVE-2024-38477 HIGH 7.5 | http_server 2.4.52 · port 80 |
| CVE-2024-39573 HIGH 7.5 | http_server 2.4.52 · port 80 |
| CVE-2024-42516 HIGH 7.5 | http_server 2.4.52 · port 80 |
| CVE-2024-43204 HIGH 7.5 | http_server 2.4.52 · port 80 |
| CVE-2024-47252 HIGH 7.5 | http_server 2.4.52 · port 80 |
| CVE-2025-49630 HIGH 7.5 | http_server 2.4.52 · port 80 |
| CVE-2025-53020 HIGH 7.5 | http_server 2.4.52 · port 80 |
| CVE-2025-55753 HIGH 7.5 | http_server 2.4.52 · port 80 |
| CVE-2025-59775 HIGH 7.5 | http_server 2.4.52 · port 80 |
| CVE-2026-29169 HIGH 7.5 | http_server 2.4.52 · port 80 |
| CVE-2026-34059 HIGH 7.5 | http_server 2.4.52 · port 80 |
| CVE-2026-34355 HIGH 7.5 | http_server 2.4.52 · port 80 |
| CVE-2026-34356 HIGH 7.5 | http_server 2.4.52 · port 80 |
| CVE-2026-42536 HIGH 7.5 | http_server 2.4.52 · port 80 |
| CVE-2026-49975 HIGH 7.5 | http_server 2.4.52 · port 80 |
| CVE-2025-49812 HIGH 7.4 | http_server 2.4.52 · port 80 |
| CVE-2023-38709 HIGH 7.3 | http_server 2.4.52 · port 80 |
| CVE-2026-29168 HIGH 7.3 | http_server 2.4.52 · port 80 |
| CVE-2026-44185 HIGH 7.3 | http_server 2.4.52 · port 80 |
| CVE-2026-44186 HIGH 7.3 | http_server 2.4.52 · port 80 |
| CVE-2025-65082 MEDIUM 6.5 | http_server 2.4.52 · port 80 |
| CVE-2026-33523 MEDIUM 6.5 | http_server 2.4.52 · port 80 |
| CVE-2026-43951 MEDIUM 6.5 | http_server 2.4.52 · port 80 |
| CVE-2024-24795 MEDIUM 6.3 | http_server 2.4.52 · port 80 |
| CVE-2026-29170 MEDIUM 6.1 | http_server 2.4.52 · port 80 |
| CVE-2023-45802 MEDIUM 5.9 | http_server 2.4.52 · port 80 |
| CVE-2026-44119 MEDIUM 5.5 | http_server 2.4.52 · port 80 |
| CVE-2025-66200 MEDIUM 5.4 | http_server 2.4.52 · port 80 |
| CVE-2022-28614 MEDIUM 5.3 | http_server 2.4.52 · port 80 |
| CVE-2022-37436 MEDIUM 5.3 | http_server 2.4.52 · port 80 |
| CVE-2026-33007 MEDIUM 5.3 | http_server 2.4.52 · port 80 |
| CVE-2026-33857 MEDIUM 5.3 | http_server 2.4.52 · port 80 |
| CVE-2026-34032 MEDIUM 5.3 | http_server 2.4.52 · port 80 |
| CVE-2026-33006 MEDIUM 4.8 | http_server 2.4.52 · port 80 |
These CVEs need a platform this host visibly does not run (for example a flaw of the Windows build on a Linux host). They are not counted.
CVEs by severity: HIGH 2 MEDIUM 1
| CVE | Software |
|---|---|
| CVE-2024-40898 HIGH 7.5 | http_server 2.4.52 · port 80 |
| CVE-2024-43394 HIGH 7.5 | http_server 2.4.52 · port 80 |
| CVE-2022-28330 MEDIUM 5.3 | http_server 2.4.52 · port 80 |
Every port that has answered a connection on this address, and when. A port is listed as open above only when a service was identified on it. Times are UTC.